Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 25;14:4473. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40069-4

Table 1.

Estimated coefficients for the Polygenic Index (PGI) in the baseline scenario (no genetic nurture, no assortative mating; between-family analyses only)

GWAS Prediction sample Meta-analysis ORIV PGI-RC PGI-RC
(Default) (GREML unc.)
~EA2 N = 1000 0.209 0.522 0.414 0.414
(0.147–0.271) (0.015–1.029) (0.287–0.542) (0.000–0.828)
~EA2 N = 4000 0.205 0.501 0.497 0.497
(0.174–0.237) (0.294–0.708) (0.421–0.573) (0.339–0.655)
~EA2 N = 16,000 0.204 0.500 0.500 0.500
(0.188–0.219) (0.403–0.598) (0.462–0.539) (0.443–0.558)
~EA4 N = 1000 0.392 0.505 0.472 0.472
(0.334–0.450) (0.417–0.593) (0.402–0.542) (0.024–0.920)
~EA4 N = 4000 0.386 0.497 0.500 0.500
(0.357–0.415) (0.453–0.541) (0.463–0.538) (0.381–0.619)
~EA4 N = 16,000 0.387 0.499 0.500 0.500
(0.373–0.402) (0.477–0.521) (0.481–0.519) (0.456–0.544)

Notes: Data are presented as the estimated coefficients +/− 1.96 times the standard error (95% confidence interval) for the Polygenic Index (PGI) using OLS regression on a meta-analysis based PGI (column 3), a 2SLS regression using ORIV (column 4), the default PGI-RC procedure (column 5), and the PGI-RC procedure, taking into account uncertainty in the GREML estimates (column 6). The GWAS discovery sample is set such that the resulting meta-analysis PGI has an R2 of 4.2% (~EA2) and 15.4% (~EA4). The true coefficient is 0.5. The simulation results are based on 100 replications.