Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 25;13:12040. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38886-0

Table 3.

Performance of the selected miR ratios on small-RNA sequencing data.

Strategy 1 Strategy 2
AUC in the original sample
 miR-335-5p_let-7f.-5p-2 0.76
 miR-199a-3p-2_let-7a-5p-2 0.71
 miR-199a-3p-2_let-7f.-5p-2 0.72
 let-7a-5p-2_miR-22-3p 0.81
 let-7a-5p-2_miR-320a 0.80
 let-7f.-5p-1_miR-19b-3p-1 0.79
 miR-27a-3p_miR-122-5p 0.71
 let-7f.-5p-2_miR-146a-5p 0.78
 miR-15b-5p_miR-16-5p-1 0.71
 miR-26b-5p_miR-142-5p 0.68
 let-7a-5p-2_miR-106b-5p 0.77
 let-7f.-5p-1_miR-103a-1 0.76
 let-7f.-5p-2_miR-103a-2 0.74
 miR-93-5p_miR-19b-3p-1 0.69
 miR-22-3p_miR-19b-3p-2 0.67
 miR-101-3p-2_miR-19b-3p-1 0.68
 miR-30d-5p_miR-20a-5p 0.68
 let-7b-5p_miR-19b-3p-1 0.74
 miR-15a-5p_miR-16-5p-2 0.66
 miR-20a-5p_miR-19b-3p-1 0.77
 miR-21-5p_miR-23a-3p 0.68
Performance of the strategies by fivefold cross-validation
 Calibration intercept 0.051 0.024
 Calibration slope 1.269 0.840
 Scaled brier 0.060 0.060
 AUC 0.797 0.791

AUC: area under the ROC curve.