Table 5.
Structural equation models predicting paths from childhood neglect and physical abuse to arrests for violence after 2000, through adult attachment avoidance
Adult Attachment Avoidance Model | β (SE) | 95% CI |
---|---|---|
Direct paths | ||
Childhood neglect → Attachment avoidance | 0.15 (0.04)*** | 0.08, 0.23 |
Childhood neglect → Violent arrest after 2000 | 0.10 (0.06) | −0.01, 0.21 |
Childhood physical abuse → Attachment avoidance | 0.06 (0.04) | −0.01, 0.14 |
Childhood physical abuse → Violent arrest after 2000 | 0.10 (0.05)* | 0.01, 0.19 |
Attachment avoidance → Violent arrest after 2000 | 0.10 (0.06) | −0.01, 0.21 |
Indirect paths | ||
Childhood neglect → Attachment avoidance → Violent arrest after 2000 | 0.02 (0.01) | −0.003, 0.03 |
Childhood physical abuse → Attachment avoidance → Violent arrest after 2000 | 0.01 (0.01) | −0.004, 0.02 |
R2/model fit | ||
R2 for attachment avoidance | 0.03* | |
R2 for violent arrest after 2000 | 0.20*** | |
CFI/TLI | 0.86/0.80 | |
RMSEA | 0.05 |
Note. β, standardized regression coefficient indicating change in z-score per unit change in independent variables; SE = standard error; CI = confidence interval; CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker–Lewis index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation. All analyses controlled for age, sex, and race.
p < .05
p < .01
p < .001.