Table 2.
Studies for neonatal motion quantification using direct sensing technology. The order is sorted by the aim of motion quantification, and year.
| Author (Refer) | Year | Subject size (P, I) | Sensing technology | Product model | Placement | Aim of motion quantification | Signal processing method of motion quantification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chung et al. [10] | 2020 | P = 35 I = 15 |
Accelerometer & gyroscope | BMI160 | Chest, using an epidermal sensor [15] | Motion/position monitoring: Recognize body positions during different activities. | Low-pass filtering, Derived rotation angles |
| Jeong et al. [13] | 2022 | I = 2 | Accelerometer & gyroscope | BMI160 | Multiple limb and head/torso positions, using silicone elastomer with medical silicone adhesives | Neuromotor pathology: Estimate pose and orientation for 3D motion reconstruction | Unified robot description format |
| Lan et al. [12] | 2018 | P = 65 | Accelerometer | wGT3x-BT | Left and right legs, using a bandage | Sleep: Transform motion counts into sleep stage estimates | Activity is processed based on the method from Sadeh et al. [16] |
| Schoch et al. [4] | 2019 | I = 50 | Accelerometer | GENEactiv | Left ankle, using a sock or paper strap to position | Sleep: Transform motion counts into sleep estimates | Squared sum of three axes |
| Raj et al. [11] | 2018 | P = 10 | Accelerometer | LIS2HH12 | Sternum or abdomen; using skin adhesive tape | Vitals: Reject unreliable period with motion artifact for respiration estimation | Squared sum of three axes, adaptive filter |
P – Preterm infants; I – Infants.