Fig. 7.

Statistical maps of the comparison between stroke patients with and without visual field defects, with using as input (A) the white matter damage predictions base on the UMCU 1 database, (B) the white matter damage predictions based on the HCP database (C) the white matter damage predictions based on the UMCU 2 database, (D) the lesion volumes, and (E) the fiber count maps according to damaged streamlines as based on the DWI data of the patients. Significant voxels (α = 5%; FWE corrected) are projected on the ch2 single subject T1-weighted image (Rorden and Brett, 2000). Images are displayed according to the neurological convention. The bottom-right part of the image shows the lesion overlap for the group of patients with and without visual field defect. The bottom left of the figure includes the table showing for each method the total volume of voxels with a significant effect, the mean -log₁₀ across voxels in this volume for the likelihood the effect was obtained through chance (FWE corrected), and same metric calculated across voxels that were significant for any of the methods.