Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 14;3(7):1984–1997. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.3c00218

Table 2. Photoreduction of CO2: Results of Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction Experimentsa.

entry PS [CoTCPc] (μM) n(CO) (μmol) n(H2) (μmol) TON(CO)b TON’(CO)c CO% Φ5 min
1 CuBCP 50.0 85.5 ± 5.3 1.33 ± 0.39 428 ± 26 42.8 ± 2.6 98.5 40 ± 5%
2 CuPBCP 50.0 1.10 ± 0.15 0.38 ± 0.13 5.50 ± 0.75 0.55 ± 0.08 74.3 0.5 ± 0.2%
3 CuPPBCP 50.0 140 ± 7 1.95 ± 0.31 700 ± 33 70.0 ± 3.3 98.6 76 ± 6%
4 IrBPY 50.0 78.4 ± 5.7 1.13 ± 0.20 392 ± 28 39.2 ± 2.8 98.6 30 ± 4%
5 CuPPBCP 5.00 38.1 ± 5.0 2.48 ± 0.44 1910 ± 250 19.1 ± 2.5 93.9 45 ± 4%
6 CuPPBCP 0.500 23.6 ± 2.8 1.70 ± 0.24 11 800 ± 1400 11.8 ± 1.4 93.2 9.7 ± 2.2%
a

Standard condition: PS (0.5 mM), xantphos ligand (1.0 mM), phenol (5.0 v%), and BIH (50 mM) in 4 mL CH3CN/TEA (v:v = 5:1) within 3 h of 425 nm irradiation (20 mW cm–2) under 1 atm CO2. The errors represent the standard deviations of three independent measurements.

b

Calculated for the TON values based on the catalyst amount (0.4 μmol).

c

Calculated for the TON values based on the PS amount (4.0 μmol).