Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 26;20:96. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01216-6

Table 3.

Influence of lesion side and consciousness on MI

2-way ANOVA Source F p-value
Fp1 Side 4.212 0.045
Consciousness 9.168 0.004
Side*Consciousness 2.267 0.138
Fp2 Side 14.429 < 0.001
Consciousness 2.205 0.143
Side*Consciousness 0.152 0.698
F7 Side 5.874 0.021
Consciousness 4.152 0.046
Side*Consciousness 0.251 0.618
F3 Side 6.201 0.013
Consciousness 5.312 0.025
Side*Consciousness 1.005 0.320
F4 Side 18.151 < 0.001
Consciousness 4.824 0.032
Side*Consciousness 0.065 0.799
F8 Side 12.177 0.001
Consciousness 1.958 0.167
Side*Consciousness 0.118 0.733
T3 Side 4.144 0.047
Consciousness 3.189 0.080
Side*Consciousness 1.011 0.319
C3 Side 4.162 0.046
Consciousness 4.570 0.037
Side*Consciousness 1.970 0.166
C4 Side 20.306  < 0.001
Consciousness 6.751 0.012
Side*Consciousness 0.166 0.685
T4 Side 14.557 < 0.001
Consciousness 2.580 0.114
Side*Consciousness 0.089 0.766
T5 Side 3.935 0.054
Consciousness 5.090 0.028
Side*Consciousness 0.710 0.403
P3 Side 3.362 0.081
Consciousness 4.412 0.040
Side*Consciousness 1.614 0.209
P4 Side 13.191 0.001
Consciousness 6.772 0.012
Side*Consciousness 0.484 0.490
T6 Side 13.603 0.001
Consciousness 4.601 0.036
Side*Consciousness 0.527 0.471

Results on secondary analysis on hemorrhagic patients only. UWS, MCS − and MCS +, e-MCS patients are respectively grouped together. For each electrode a 2-way ANOVA was performed with the main effects represented by side (left versus right) and consciousness (EMCS/MCS + versus MCS − /UWS). Variable in bold were considered significant