Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 25;15:91. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00683-7

Table 2.

Comparison of the characteristics of adolescent and adult athletes with and without eating disorder risk

Characteristic Adolescent athletes (n = 82) Adult athletes (n = 159)
ED+ ED- ED+ ED-
n = 12 n = 70 p-value n = 11 n = 148 p-value
M±SD
or % ( n )
M±SD
or % ( n )
Body weight (kg) 57.2 ± 10.39 53.5 ± 14.68 .4951a 63.5 ± 8.63 61.7 ± 8.83 .2205a
Height (cm) 161.9 ± 9.17 165.3 ± 13.59 .2510a 168.7 ± 1.97 170.0 ± 7.49 .9621a
BMI status
Underweight 0 14 (10) .0060b 0 19 (13) .3322b
Normal weight 66 (8) 82 (57) 91 (10) 86 (128)
Overweight 33 (4)* 4 (3) 9 (1) 5 (7)
Body satisfaction (pt) 11.4 ± 6.42* 17.4 ± 4.40 .0032a 15.3 ± 6.42 18.2 ± 4.51 .1845a
Sport type
Lean aesthetic 8 (1)* 44 (31) ≤ .0001b 0 16 (24) .1428b
Lean non-aesthetic 59 (7)* 4 (3) 36 (4) 26 (38)
Ball 33 (4) 52 (36) 64 (7) 58 (86)
Level of competition
National 58 (7)* 27 (19) .0330c 55 (6) 31 (46) .2050c
International 42 (5) 73 (51) 45 (5) 69 (102)
Training background (years) 6.63 ± 2.50 5.63 ± 2.27 .2676a 8.36 ± 4.32 10.66 ± 4.67 .1099a

Note: aMann–Whitney U test; bChi2NW test; cV-square test; *p < .05, significantly different from ED-.

BMI = body mass index; ED + = with eating disorder risk; ED- = without eating disorder risk; M – mean; SD = standard deviation; % (n) = percent (number); pt = point