Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 25;23:275. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02574-6

Table 3.

Multiple Cox regression analysis of AGR in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with anlotinib

Exposure Crude model Minimally adjusted model Fully adjusted model
Hazard ratio (95% CIs), p-value Hazard ratio (95% CIs), p-value Hazard ratio (95% CIs), p-value
AGR 0.47 (0.26, 0.84) 0.0105 0.53 (0.29, 0.96) 0.0365 0.40 (0.18, 0.88) 0.0230
AGR (tertiles)
Low Ref Ref Ref
Middle 0.58 (0.36, 0.95) 0.0293 0.58 (0.35, 0.96) 0.0332 0.65 (0.36, 1.16) 0.1410
High 0.52 (0.32, 0.84) 0.0080 0.55 (0.33, 0.91) 0.0187 0.49 (0.26, 0.92) 0.0273
p for trend 0.0073 0.0164 0.0277

Crude model adjusted for: None

Minimally adjusted model adjusted for: Age; Gender; Never smoker

Fully adjusted model adjusted for: Age, years; Gender; Never smoker; Hypertension; ALK rearrangement; EGFR mutation; Histology; Tumor stage; ECOG PS score; Number of metastases; Number of previous treatment lines; Number of previous chemotherapy lines; Previous targeted therapy; Previous radiotherapy; Previous immunotherapy; Anlotinib monotherapy; Leukocyte; Neutrophil; Lymphocyte; Platelets. Restricted cubic spline was applied