Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 25;11:214. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01247-7

Table 4.

Measurement invariance of BWAS across four major economic districts in China based on Sample B (N = 347)

Model χ 2 df p CFI TLI RMSEA SRMR χ2 df p |△CFI| |△RMSEA|
M1: Configural invariance 85.264 56 0.007 0.961 0.942 0.078 0.044 - - - - -

M2: Metric

invariance

101.722 74 0.018 0.963 0.958 0.066 0.064 16.459 18 0.561 0.002 0.012

M3: Scalar

invariance

127.044 92 0.009 0.954 0.958 0.066 0.071 25.321 18 0.116 0.009 0.000
M4: Strict invariance 142.754 113 0.031 0.961 0.971 0.055 0.077 15.710 21 0.786 0.007 0.011

Note. BWAS = Bergen Work Addiction Scale; CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual. Sample B includes 88 participants from central China, 200 from eastern China, 36 from western China, and 23 from northeastern China