Table 4.
Measurement invariance of BWAS across four major economic districts in China based on Sample B (N = 347)
| Model | χ 2 | df | p | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | SRMR | △χ2 | △df | △p | |△CFI| | |△RMSEA| | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1: Configural invariance | 85.264 | 56 | 0.007 | 0.961 | 0.942 | 0.078 | 0.044 | - | - | - | - | - | |
|
M2: Metric invariance |
101.722 | 74 | 0.018 | 0.963 | 0.958 | 0.066 | 0.064 | 16.459 | 18 | 0.561 | 0.002 | 0.012 | |
|
M3: Scalar invariance |
127.044 | 92 | 0.009 | 0.954 | 0.958 | 0.066 | 0.071 | 25.321 | 18 | 0.116 | 0.009 | 0.000 | |
| M4: Strict invariance | 142.754 | 113 | 0.031 | 0.961 | 0.971 | 0.055 | 0.077 | 15.710 | 21 | 0.786 | 0.007 | 0.011 | |
Note. BWAS = Bergen Work Addiction Scale; CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual. Sample B includes 88 participants from central China, 200 from eastern China, 36 from western China, and 23 from northeastern China