Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 13;89(7):e00128-23. doi: 10.1128/aem.00128-23

TABLE 1.

Cumulative risk and risk reduction of SARS-CoV-2 infection for indoor workersa

Infection control strategy Shared car transportation Work shift distancing
Break in breakroom Private housing Daily cumulative riskb
1 m 2 m 1-m distancing 2-m distancing
Nonec 0.698 (0.356 to 0.955) 1.00 (0.983 to 1.00) 0.530 (0.246 to 0.850) 0.024 (0.009 to 0.058) None 1.00 (0.995 to 1.00) 0.865 (0.571 to 0.992)
Handwashing and surface disinfectiond No 1.00 (0.00%) 0.426 (19.7%) No None 1.00 (0.00%) 0.833 (3.78%)
Cloth maskd 0.163 (76.7%) 0.866 (13.4%) 0.148 (72.0%) No None 0.896 (10.4%) 0.303 (65.0%)
Surgical maskd 0.108 (84.5%) 0.749 (25.1%) 0.076 (85.7%) No None 0.785 (21.5%) 0.186 (78.6%)
Double maskd 0.025 (96.4%) 0.332 (66.8%) 0.025 (95.3%) No None 0.378 (62.2%) 0.058 (93.3%)
Increased air exchanged 0.126 (81.9%) 0.904 (9.64%) 0.081 (84.7%) 0.004 (81.7%) None 0.923 (7.74%) 0.217 (75.0%)
a

The table shows the cumulative risk and risk reduction (%) of SARS-CoV-2 infection for a susceptible indoor produce worker exposed to an infected co-worker. “No” indicates that the infection control strategy was not applied (see Methods). “None” means that there was no risk of infection in the private housing scenario. SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

b

Assuming there is contact between an infected and susceptible individual in every environmental scenario except for private housing.

c

The values represent median (95% uncertainty interval) SARS-CoV-2 infection risk.

d

The values represent median (% reduction) SARS-CoV-2 infection risk compared to no infection control strategy.