Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 26.
Published in final edited form as: Child Maltreat. 2019 Oct 14;25(3):328–338. doi: 10.1177/1077559519879510

Table 4.

Sequential Logistic Regression Predicting Permanency Out- comes in Full Analytic Sample.

Reunified Vs. Not Reunified If Not Reunified: Adopted Vs. Not Adopted If Not Reunified or Adopted: Kin Guardianship Vs. No Permanency

CASA status 0.84*** 1.17** 0.78**
Age-group
 Babies Referent Referent Referent
 Toddlers l.61*** .59*** .68*
 Preschool 1.73*** .45*** .44***
 Grade school 1.81*** .28*** .19***
 Teens 1.33*** .06*** .03***
First placement type
 Kinship Referent Referent Referent
 Foster 1.52*** 1.28*** .35***
 Congregate 1.54*** 1.09 .24***
 Other 1.23** .99 .31***
Race/ethnicity
 White Referent Referent Referent
 African American .75*** .94 .56***
 Hispanic .92 1.18** .72***
 Other .89 1.01 .76
Rural county 1.16* .91 1.13
Prior investigations 70*** 1.00 .84*
Prior removals .66** 1.47** .75
Domestic violence .79*** 1.13* 1.05
Number of siblings removed
 0 Referent Referent Referent
 1 1.28*** 1.12* 1.79***
 2 1.36*** 1.12 1.72***
 3 or more 1.33*** 1.25** 1.14
Number of caregiver risk factors
 0 Referent Referent Referent
 1 .61*** 1.51*** 1.20
 2 .52*** 1.66*** 1.09
 3 or more 54*** 1.79*** 1.54*
Number of removal reasons
 1 Referent Referent Referent
 2 .96 1.01 .91
 3 or more .89 1.03 .88

Note. Clustered by case ID with IPWs. N = 31,754. Coefficients are odds ratios. IPWs = inverse probability weightings; CASA = Court Appointed Special Advocate.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p <.001.