Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 10;43(8):2737–2747. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02673-7

Table 2.

Astigmatic refractive outcomes

Time Point Absolute postoperative IOL rotation (degrees) Residual refractive astigmatism (D) Residual refractive astigmatism ≤ 0.5 D, % (n) Residual refractive astigmatism ≤ 1.0 D,% (n) Absolute residual astigmatism prediction error ≤ 0.5 D,% (n) Total (N)
Predicted 0.23 ± 0.034a 35
POD#1 1.3 ± 0.28 0.19 ± 0.040 33 (94%) 35 (100%) 33 (94%) 35
POW#1 1.5 ± 0.26 0.20 ± 0.047 31 (89%) 35 (100%) 30 (86%) 35
POM#1 1.1 ± 0.22 0.21 ± 0.047 32 (94%) 34 (100%) 32 (94%) 34
P value P = .58b P = .91b P = .58c equal distribution P = .34c

a, t test for equal means between predicted and POM#1 residual astigmatism had P = 0.730; b, one-way ANOVA for equal means; c, chi-square test

POD#1, postoperative day 1; POW#1, postoperative week 1; POM#1, postoperative month 1