Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 26;10:73. doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00641-9

Table 5.

Coefficient, p-value and pseudo-R2 after univariate quantile regression to predict the Goodman A score

Variable Coefficient P-Value Pseudo-R2
Age 0 (-0.32 to 0.32) 0.999 0.001
Male -6.25 (-11.94 to -0.56) 0.030* 0.001
WOMAC-pain -2.84 (–3.33 to -2.36)  < 0.000* 0.260
WOMAC-Stiffness -6.25 (-7.43 to -5.07)  < 0.000* 0.240
WOMAC-Function -0.80 (-0.95 to 105.03)  < 0.000* 0.240
Kujala 0.42 (0.26 to 0.59)  < 0.000* 0.200
KOOS QL 0.22 (0.12 to 0.32)  < 0.000* 0.180
Anterior knee pain -12.5 (-20.6 to -4.41) 0.003* 0.060
Follow-up -0.70 (-2.51 to 1.11) 0.444 0.010
ROM 0 (-0.21 to 0.21) 0.999 0.001
Extension 0 (-0.61 to 0.61) 0.999 0.001
Extension difference 0 (-0.61 to 0.61) 0.999 0.001
Flexion 0 (-0.25 to 0.25) 0.999 0.001
Flexion difference 0 (-0.24 to 0.24) 0.999 0.001
BMI at FU 0 (-0.59 to 0.59) 0.999 0.001
Up and Go test -0.64 (-1.32 to 0.05) 0.070 0.020
Situp test 0 (-0.81 to 0.81) 0.999 0.001
Muscular force 0 (-0.03 to 0.03) 0.999 0.001
Algometry 0.32 (-0.12 to 0.77) 0.150 0.002

Abbreviations: WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, KOOS QL Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score quality of life, ROM Range of motion, BMI Body mass index, FU Follow-up

*significant coefficient (p-value < 0.05)