Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 13;43(8):2763–2776. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02675-5

Table 6.

Median IOP with interquartile ranges at each follow-up interval

Surgery Initial review IOP (mmHg)
(N = 67)
1-month IOP (mmHg) (N = 57) 6-month
IOP (mmHg)
(N = 59)
12-month IOP (mmHg)
(N = 51)
18-month IOP (mmHg)
(N = 44)
24-month IOP (mmHg)
(N = 43)

BVT

(N = 18)

38.5 (IR 25) 14.0 (IR 17) 14.0 (IR 10) 14.0 (IR 7) 11.0 (IR 5) 13.0 (IR 17)

TSCPC

(N = 36)

40.5 (IR 21) 22 (IR 28) 17.0 (IR 19) 18.5 (IR 11) 17.0 (IR 13) 19.0 (IR 11)

Delayed or no surgery

(N = 8)

31.0 (IR 13) 17.5 (IR 18) 16.0 (IR 26) 23.0 (IR 32) 22.0 (IR 15) 14.5 (IR 18)

PPV

(N = 3)

29.0 (IR nil) 15.0 (IR nil) 11.0 (IR nil) 32.0 (IR nil) 40.0 (IR nil) 37.0 (IR nil)

Trab + MMC

(N = 2)

36.0 (IR nil) 8.0 (IR nil) 8.0 (IR 0) 14.5 (IR nil) Nil Nil
Statistically significant difference Mann–Whitney test (for two variables) and Kruskal–Wallis for all variables 1. BVT vs TSCPC vs Delayed or no surgery vs PPV vs Trab + MMC (p = 0.124)

1. BVT vs TSCPC (p < 0.028, Z = −2.2)

2. BVT vs TSCPC vs Delayed or no surgery vs PPV vs Trab + MMC (p = 0.069)

1. BVT vs TSCPC vs Delayed or no surgery vs PPV vs Trab + MMC (p = 0.127)

1. BVT vs TSCPC (p < 0.022, Z = −2.3)

2. BVT vs TSCPC vs Delayed or no surgery vs PPV vs Trab + MMC (p = 0.113)

1. BVT vs TSCPC (p < 0.049, Z = −2.0)

2. BVT vs TSCPC vs Delayed or no surgery vs PPV vs Trab + MMC (p = 0.133)

2. BVT vs TSCPC vs Delayed or no surgery vs PPV vs Trab + MMC (p = 0.798)

BVT Baerveldt tube, TSCPC trans-scleral cyclophotocoagulation, PPV pars plana vitrectomy, Trab + MMC trabeculectomy and mitomycin C