Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 11;9(7):e18172. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18172

Table 5.

ANOVA for the quadratic model of PCP in PNG removal.

Source Sum of squares df Mean square F-value p-value
Model 823.78 14 58.84 162.95 <0.0001 significant
A-pH 160.17 1 160.17 443.54 <0.0001
B-Dose 240.67 1 240.67 666.46 <0.0001
C-PNG Con 73.50 1 73.50 203.54 <0.0001
D-Time 121.50 1 121.50 336.46 <0.0001
AB 36.00 1 36.00 99.69 <0.0001
AC 20.25 1 20.25 56.08 <0.0001
BC 30.25 1 30.25 83.77 <0.0001
CD 90.25 1 90.25 249.92 <0.0001
A2 15.43 1 15.43 42.73 <0.0001
B2 3.86 1 3.86 10.68 0.0052
C2 3.86 1 3.86 10.68 0.0052
D2 27.43 1 27.43 75.96 <0.0001
Residual 5.42 15 0.3611
Lack of Fit 5.42 10 0.5417 3.2 0.981 Not significant
Pure Error 0.0000 5 0.0000
Cor Total 829.20 29

Accordingly, the F-value is 162.95 and the P-value is 0.0001, which indicates the model is well suited to explain the amplification of the relationship between response values. In addition, the model discernment is satisfactory if the precision ratio is greater than 4.0 [47].