Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 13;17:1149864. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1149864

Table 5.

Comparison of wanting and liking levels toward high-calorie food cues and low-calorie food cues among groups.

BE group Control group
Measure Hungry condition (N = 29) Satiated condition (N = 29) Hungry condition (N = 29) Satiated condition (N = 29) Test statistics (F)
Wanting_high-calorie 58.395 (21.004) 43.693 (21.621) 47.943 (19.763) 30.395 (18.184) 0.211
Wanting_low-calorie 45.839 (18.115) 37.487 (18.104) 42.969 (18.124) 29.161 (16.327) 0.377
Liking_high-calorie 69.406 (15.958) 65.421 (19.725) 65.441 (17.418) 62.701 (18.205) 0.029
Liking_low-calorie 53.475 (16.635) 54.766 (18.678) 52.812 (14.445) 51.939 (15.376) 0.225

Mean (standard deviation). BE group, binge eating group; control group, weight-matched control group.

Wanting_high-calorie: average of wanting VAS for high-calorie food stimulus, Wanting_low-calorie: average of wanting VAS for low-calorie food stimulus, Liking_high-calorie food cues: average of liking VAS for high-calorie food stimulus, Liking_low-calorie food cues: average of liking VAS for low-calorie food stimulus.