Table 3.

Comparison of means for time 1 (T1) and time 2 (T2) adolescent outcomes by parenting typologies for adolescent males (Top Row) and females (Bottom Row)

	High monitoring/low conflict	Moderate monitoring/moderate conflict	High monitoring/moderately high conflict	F Statistic (df)
T1 depressive symptoms	1.19a	1.51c	1.61b	F(2) = 5.30**
	1.45	1.65	1.78	F(2) = 2.56
T2 depressive symptoms	1.15a	1.57b	1.62b	F(2) = 10.47***
	1.59	1.68	1.73	F(2) = 1.12
T1 grade point average	2.93	2.46	2.44	F(2) = 3.61*
	3.10	2.70	3.03	F(2) = 3.16*
T2 grade point average	2.89a	2.45b	2.52	F(2) = 4.61*
	3.04a	2.67b	3.08a	F(2) = 5.08**

Notes: F-test indicates significance for overall between-group differences. The different subscripts for values in same row indicate statistically significant between-group differences at a probability of <0.05 for mean values of youth outcomes between parenting typologies. Results from Bonferroni post-hoc comparison tests manifest marginally statistically significant differences in T1 GPA by parenting profile: for females, the difference was between “high monitoring/low conflict” and “moderate monitoring/moderate conflict” (p = 0.052); and, for males, differences were between “high monitoring/low conflict” and both “moderate monitoring/moderate conflict” (p = 0.087) and “high monitoring/moderately high conflict” (p = 0.054)

^*p < 0.05

^**p < 0.01

^***p < 0.001