Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 17;299(8):104939. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.104939

Table 2.

Gene Ontology (GO) Process Term analysis for genes identified in genome-wide screen

Gene Ontology Term Cluster frequency Genome frequency Corrected p value Genes
sulfate assimilation 5 of 128 genes, 3.9% 9 of 7166 genes, 0.1% 0.00012 MET3 MET5 MET8 MET10 MET14
sulfur compound biosynthetic process 10 of 128 genes, 7.8% 82 of 7166 genes, 1.1% 0.00102 HOM2 HOM3 MET2 MET3 MET5 MET6 MET10 MET14 PDA1 SAM1
sulfur amino acid metabolic process 8 of 128 genes, 6.2% 49 of 7166 genes, 0.7% 0.00124 HOM2 HOM3 MET2 MET3 MET5 MET6 MET14 SAM1
hydrogen sulfide metabolic process 4 of 128 genes, 3.1% 8 of 7166 genes, 0.1% 0.00395 MET3 MET5 MET10 MET14
hydrogen sulfide biosynthetic process 4 of 128 genes, 3.1% 8 of 7166 genes, 0.1% 0.00395 MET3 MET5 MET10 MET14

128 genes with ΔOD595 values greater than or equal to 0.079 in screen for genes with potential roles in ER protein degradation were analyzed using the Gene Ontology Term Finder at the Saccharomyces Genome Database (https://www.yeastgenome.org/goTermFinder) using a p-value cutoff of 0.01. No Function or Component GO Terms were significantly enriched for the input list of 128 genes.