Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov;28(11):10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.11.1321. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.11.1321

TABLE 4.

Two-Part Models on Total Costs Outcomes Comparing Rural With Urban Settings

Part 1a Part 2a Marginal effectb Mean (95% CI)
OR: Point estimate (95% CI) P value RR: Point estimate (95% CI) P value
Outpatient services 0.61 (0.48-0.79) 0.0002 1.00 (0.98-1.00) 0.9061 −25.57 (−280.82 to 220.67)
Inpatient services 1.02 (0.99-1.05) 0.2944 0.92 (0.88-0.96) < 0.0001 −835.56 (−1,283.56 to −333.59)
All medications 1.08 (1.00-1.16) 0.0483 0.98 (0.95-1.00) 0.1052 −84.65 (−189.59 to 33.36)
Total ED visits 1.05 (1.02-1.08) 0.0005 1.02 (0.98-1.05) 0.3373 58.56 (5.60-109.65)
  ED visits into outpatient visits 1.12 (1.09-1.15) < 0.0001 0.98 (0.95-1.01) 0.1667 48.83 (9.10-90.63)
  ED visits into inpatient admission 1.02 (0.98-1.05) 0.3537 1.05 (0.99-1.12) 0.0749 23.15 (4.22-43.38)
Total costs for payers and patients across different services 0.86 (0.33-2.27) 0.7631 0.97 (0.95-0.99) 0.0084 -750.81 (−1,226.82 to −228.64)

a Analyses adjusted for age, sex, insurance type, health plans, CCI, geographic region, calendar year at the index date, and the number of unique generic product identifier.

b Marginal effect was calculated by the difference in expected outcome. Mean marginal effect is the mean value based on 1,000 iteration bootstrapping with sample with replacement, and 95% CI of marginal effect was constructed based on 2.5% and 97.5% percentile of bootstrapped marginal effects.

AF = atrial fibrillation; CCI = Charlson Comorbidity Index; ED = emergency department; OR = odds ratio; RR = relative ratio.