Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr;28(4):10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.4.473. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.4.473

TABLE 3.

Spearman Correlation Coefficients and Percentage of Exact Agreement Between Patient-Level MCS and MRCI

Record count subset HP JHHS
Spearman rhoa % Exact n (%) Spearman rhoa % Exact n (%)
Full sample 0.572 86.2 45,780 (100.0) 0.627 76.5 28,589 (100.0)
  eHigh-cHigh 0.500 79.3 13,866 (30.3) 0.500 75.2 10,812 (37.8)
  eLow-cLow 0.284 90.7 19,351 (42.3) 0.391 76.0 12,042 (42.1)
  eHigh-cLow 0.409 82.0 3,627 (7.9) 0.209 77.7 2,507 (8.8)
  eLow-cHigh 0.156 88.8 8,936 (19.5) 0.066 81.8 3,228 (11.3)
All similar 0.796 85.9 33,217 (72.6) 0.779 75.6 22,854 (79.9)
All dissimilar −0.382 86.8 12,563 (27.4) −0.396 80.0 5,735 (20.1)
Exclude eLow-cHigh 0.764 85.6 36,844 (80.5) 0.734 75.8 25,361 (88.7)

Subsets of patients were identified as having high or low (partitioned at the 50th percentile) medication counts using either EHR (e) or claims (c) records. Similar and dissimilar subsets were defined as instances in which EHR and claims were both or differentially low and high, hence the subset convention (eg, eHigh-cHigh, eHigh-cLow). According to Hartman (1977) and Steimler (2004), values between 75% and 90% demonstrate an acceptable level of agreement and not a strong agreement.

a Indicates test significance at P < 0.001.

EHR = electronic health record; HP = HealthPartners; JHHS = Johns Hopkins Health System; MCS = medication complexity score (novel measure developed by this study, calculated from pharmacy claims data); MRCI = Medication Regimen Complexity Index (established measure calculated from electronic health records).