Table 5.

Results of multiple regression analysis examining the effect of working environment on well-being dimensions (hedonic well-being, eudaimonic well-being, psychological richness).

	β	t	95% CI
Hedonic well-being
(Intercept)	4.06**	43.07	[4.00, 4.12]
Gender (0; male, 1; female)	−0.16	−1.57	[−0.22, −0.09]
Age	−0.18***	−3.52	[−0.22, −0.15]
Marriage (0; unmarried. 1; married)	−0.37***	−3.34	[−0.44, −0.30]
Income	0.18***	3.22	[0.14, 0.21]
Control of homeworking	0.18**	3.44	[0.14, 0.21]
Homeworking	0.05	0.94	[0.01, 0.09]
Work at office	0.14**	2.61	[0.10, 0.17]
Eudaimonic well-being
(Intercept)	3.89***	47.68	[3.84, 3.95]
Gender (0; male, 1; female)	0.12	1.41	[0.06, 0.18]
Age	−0.07	−1.55	[−0.10, −0.04]
Marriage (0; unmarried. 1; married)	−0.14	−1.49	[−0.21, −0.08]
Income	0.16**	3.30	[0.12, 0.19]
Control of homeworking	0.09	1.94	[0.06, 0.12]
Homeworking	−0.03	−0.64	[−0.06, 0.00]
Work at office	0.09*	2.00	[0.06, 0.12]
Psychological richness
(Intercept)	4.21***	57.45	[4.16, 4.26]
Gender (0; male, 1; female)	−0.17*	−2.24	[−0.23, −0.12]
Age	−0.02	−0.48	[−0.05, 0.01]
Marriage (0; unmarried. 1; married)	−0.08	−0.93	[−0.14, −0.02]
Income	0.13**	2.95	[0.1, 0.15]
Control of homeworking	0.08*	1.97	[0.05, 0.11]
Homeworking	0.03	0.81	[0.01, 0.06]
Work at office	0.04	0.93	[0.01, 0.07]

β and CI indicate the standardized regression weights and the confidence interval, respectively. “Homeworking” indicates an increase or decrease in work at home, while “work at office” indicates an increase or decrease in work outside of the home. “Hedonic well-being” and “Eudaimonic well-being” were measured by the Satisfaction with Life Scale and the Meaning in Life Questionnaire, respectively; *** indicates p < 0.001; ** indicates p < 0.01; * indicates p < 0.05.