. 2023 May 12;35(5):547–552. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.05.005

Table 1.

Median (IQR) MTT cell viability assay of fibroblast attachment after treatment with conditioning agents at two different time periods.

	Control (No TTT)	RP (curettes)	HA	EDTA	EMD	EDTA/EMD
Short time	0.199 (0.391)	0.031 (0.005)	0.471 (0.433)	0.391 (0.018)^††	0.511 (0.826)	0.561 (0.5)^**
Long time	0.199 (0.391)	0.031 (0.005)	0.471 (0.256)^@	0.878 (0.505)^*^†^$	0.149 (0.017)	0.669 (0.898)^#

TTT = Treatment, IQR = Interquartile range (75–25 percentile).

^††

Significant difference between EDTA (Short time) and RP (short time period) (Tukey test; P < 0.05).

Significant difference between HA (long time period) and RP (short time period) (Tukey’s test; P < 0.05).

Significant difference between EDTA (long time period) and RP (short time period) (Tukey’s test; P < 0.05).

^†

Significant difference between EDTA (long time) and EMD (long time) (Tukey test; P < 0.05).

^**

Significant difference between EDTA + EMD (Short time) and RP (short time) (Tukey test; P < 0.05).

Significant difference between EDTA (long time period) and No TTT (Tukey’s test; P < 0.05).

Significant difference between EDTA + EMD (long time period) and RP (short time period) (Tukey test; P < 0.05).