Skip to main content
. 2023 May 20;4(7):417–426. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2023.05.002

Table 3.

Multivariate competing risk regression for time to ELA

Variable ELA (95% CI) P value
Primary device type (pacemaker vs ICD) 0.964 (0.554–1.679) .8972
Sex (female vs male) 1.052 (0.731–1.516) .7841
Age (by decile) 0.915 (0.764–1.097) .3367
Lead chamber (RA vs RV) 1.683 (1.061–2.670) .0270
Lead manufacturer (Abbott vs Medtronic) 10.443 (5.151, 21.170) <.001
 Lead French size (by 1 unit) 0.955 (0.641–1.423) .8199
Lead access .7131
 Cephalic vs other 0.808 (0.325–2.010) .6467
 Subclavian vs other 0.874 (0.357–2.801) .7682
 Cephalic vs subclavian 0.924 (0.639–1.338) .6775

CI = confidence interval; ELA = electrical lead abnormality; ICD = implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; RA = right atrium; RV = right ventricle.

Global P value for overall difference between all categories in variable.