Klapper 1997.
Methods | Prospective, randomised, double‐blind, parallel trial. Five half‐lives washout period. Total duration then 16 weeks. 4‐week single‐blind, placebo‐only baseline period. 12‐week treatment period Discontinuation rate: dropout: 25% of randomised participants Compliance (adherence) data: compliance data not reported Rule for use of acute medication: fewer than 3 times per week, but no information about permitted medications Methodological quality score: 4 |
|
Participants | Inclusion: migraine according to ICHD‐I; migraine onset at least 6 months prior to study; at least 2 attacks per month for previous 3 months Exclusion: daily headaches and analgesic overuse headaches were adequately excluded. No information on the exclusion of secondary headaches is reported. Other exclusions: more than 15 days of non‐migrainous headache per month, migraine symptoms without headache, pregnancy, inadequate contraception for women, previous treatment with valproate, failure of more than 2 other migraine prophylactic agents, significant medical or psychiatric disorder, many concomitant medications Setting: multi‐centre Country: USA and Canada 176 migraine patients were randomised; 91% had had attacks without aura and 40% with aura. 157 females and 19 males; age range 17 to 76 |
|
Interventions | Divalproex sodium 500 mg versus 1000 mg versus 1500 mg versus placebo (12 weeks). Dosage titrated for 4 weeks, then maintained for 8 weeks | |
Outcomes | Number of headache days per 28 days. Number of migraine attacks per 28 days. Frequency of non‐migraine headaches Time point(s) considered in the review: entire 3‐month treatment phase |
|
Notes | Funders of the trial: Abbott Laboratories | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Description of method for random sequence generation (1:1:1:1 ratio within each study centre) is lacking |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Single‐blind baseline phase followed by double‐blind experimental phase. Placebo tablets were matched to verum |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Intention‐to‐treat analysis includes all randomised participants who provided headache data during the double‐blind phase |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Dose comparisons not possible, as insufficient data were provided |