Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 13;13:1116999. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1116999

Table 5.

Comparison of different studies calculated the CTV-PTV margin based on the measured intrafraction prostate motion data.

Authors Modality Margin (mm) Mean treatment time (mins) No of patients Coverage criteria
LR AP SI
Polat et al (14) CBCT 6 6 6 16 21 90% PP-95%PD
Beltran et al (34) Implanted fiducial and EPI images 4.8 5.2 5.4 7 40 90% PP-95%PD
Kotte et al (35) Implanted fiducial and EPI images 2 2 2 5-7 427 90% PP-95%PD
Skarsgard et al (36) Implanted fiducial and EPI images 3.6 3.7 3.7 Not specified 72 95% probability of complete CTV coverage
Steiner et al (37) Implanted fiducial and stereoscopic kV images 3.7 3.6 2.6 9.7 9 90% PP-95%PD
2.3 6.2 3.9 15.0 3
Both et al (38) Electromagnetic localization and tracking 3 3 3 6 24 CTV for 95% of treatment time
Wang et al (39) Electromagnetic localization and tracking 3 3 3 6 30 Margin covering CTV for 95% of treatment time
Pang et al (40) Clarity 4D TPUS 1.02 2.65 2.41 8 55 90% PP-95%PD
1.84 4.63 4.29 15
Franco et al (30) Clarity 4D TPUS 5 5 5 7 46 95% PP-99%PD

4D TPUS- Four-dimensional transperineal Ultrasound.

90%PP-95%PD-90% of the patient population receiving 95% prescription dose.

95%PP-99%PD-95% of the patient population receiving 99% prescription dose.