Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 25;12(3):e002271. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002271

Table 2.

Proportion of primary care clinics ranked as high performing across multiple measures by high-need, high-cost subpopulations

High-performing clinics, n (%)*
Adults under 65 with disability Older adults with frailty Beneficiaries with major complex chronic conditions
Overall
 Any combination of ≥4 measures 91 (3.3) 89 (3.2) 97 (3.5)
 All 5 measures 9 (0.3) 7 (0.3) 14 (0.5)
Example combinations
 Annual spending and avoidable hospitalisations 205 (7.4) 240 (8.7) 242 (8.7)
 Annual spending, avoidable hospitalisations and ED visits 82 (3.0) 65 (2.3) 89 (3.2)
 Annual spending and healthy days at home 209 (7.5) 276 (10.0) 253 (9.1)
 Hospital readmissions and avoidable hospitalisations 214 (7.7) 209 (7.5) 195 (7.0)

*Results were limited to primary care clinics that had at least 10 beneficiaries from all three subpopulations (2770 clinics). High-performing clinics were defined as those in the top quartile of performance across listed measures for a given patient subpopulation (ie, lowest average annual spending per high-need person, lowest rate of avoidable hospitalisations per high-need person, lowest ED visit rates, lowest hospital readmission rates and highest number of healthy days at home). Of note, if the quality measures were independent of each other, we would expect 6.25% of clinics to be in the top quartiles of any 2 measures and 3.125% to be in the top quartiles of any 3 quality measures.

ED, emergency department.