Table 2.
Proportion of primary care clinics ranked as high performing across multiple measures by high-need, high-cost subpopulations
High-performing clinics, n (%)* | |||
Adults under 65 with disability | Older adults with frailty | Beneficiaries with major complex chronic conditions | |
Overall | |||
Any combination of ≥4 measures | 91 (3.3) | 89 (3.2) | 97 (3.5) |
All 5 measures | 9 (0.3) | 7 (0.3) | 14 (0.5) |
Example combinations | |||
Annual spending and avoidable hospitalisations | 205 (7.4) | 240 (8.7) | 242 (8.7) |
Annual spending, avoidable hospitalisations and ED visits | 82 (3.0) | 65 (2.3) | 89 (3.2) |
Annual spending and healthy days at home | 209 (7.5) | 276 (10.0) | 253 (9.1) |
Hospital readmissions and avoidable hospitalisations | 214 (7.7) | 209 (7.5) | 195 (7.0) |
*Results were limited to primary care clinics that had at least 10 beneficiaries from all three subpopulations (2770 clinics). High-performing clinics were defined as those in the top quartile of performance across listed measures for a given patient subpopulation (ie, lowest average annual spending per high-need person, lowest rate of avoidable hospitalisations per high-need person, lowest ED visit rates, lowest hospital readmission rates and highest number of healthy days at home). Of note, if the quality measures were independent of each other, we would expect 6.25% of clinics to be in the top quartiles of any 2 measures and 3.125% to be in the top quartiles of any 3 quality measures.
ED, emergency department.