Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar-Apr;16(2):357–362. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2574

Table 4.

Student t-test comparison of mixed dentition noncrowded and crowded arches

Mixed upper noncrowded Mixed upper crowded Comparison
Sample size Average Standard deviation Sample size Average Standard deviation t-value p-value Inference
Intermolar width 111 30.9033 2.2322 39 29.4231 2.2359 3.5581 0.0005 Significant difference
Intercanine width 111 24.9892 2.0978 39 20.5974 3.0115 0.7509 0. 007 Significant difference
Arch length 111 28.7351 2.0396 39 29.1769 2.0447 1.1615 0.2473 No significant difference
Available arch length 111 79.5405 5.1958 39 79.8205 4.6503 0.3135 0.7544 No significant difference
Sum of incisors 111 28.8477 2.1810 39 30.6641 2.6520 3.8447 0.0002 Significant difference
Sample size Average Standard deviation Sample size Average Standard deviation t-statistic p-value Inference
Intermolar width 80 28.0938 2.1804 70 27.5314 2.0063 1.6444 0.1022 No significant difference
Intercanine width 80 19.5650 1.7353 70 16.4371 1.9941 0.4160 0.0005 Significant difference
Arch length 80 24.8100 1.5799 70 25.1086 1.7303 1.0978 0.2741 No significant difference
Available arch length 80 71.8125 3.8651 70 71.8429 4.9917 0.0412 0.9672 No significant difference
Sum of incisors 80 21.0288 1.6212 70 22.6300 1.7711 5.7456 0.0000 Significant difference