Table 3.

Multi-level Modeling Analyses for Effects of Daily ER Motives on Relative Strategy Use (Study 2)

	Relative strategy use
	b(SE) 95%CI	p
Intercept	−.15
Warmth motive
Between-person	.12(.05)[.01,.22]	.03
Within-person	−.00(.02)[−.05,.04]	.85
Competence motive
Between-person	−.07(.05)[−.17,.03]	.19
Within-person	.02(.02)[−.03,.06]	.40
Pro-hedonic motive
Between-person	−.09(.04)[−.18,.00]	.05
Within-person	−.05(.02)[−.10,−.00]	.03
ER strategy type
Reappraisal	−.23(.10)[−.44,−.04]	.22
Distraction	−.09(.09)[−.28,.11]	.62
ER strategy type × motive
Reappraisal × Warmth motive between-person	−.12(.06)[−.26,.01]	.25
Reappraisal × Warmth motive within-person	.01(.03)[−.05,.07]	.89
Reappraisal × Competence motive between-person	.07(.06)[−.05,.20]	.50
Reappraisal × Competence motive within-person	−.01(.03)[−.07,.05]	.89
Reappraisal × Pro-hedonic motive between-person	.15(.05)[.04,.27]	<.01
Reappraisal × Pro-hedonic motive within-person	.12(.03)[.04,.18]	.001
Distraction × Warmth motive between-person	−.22(.06)[−.36,−.09]	.02
Distraction × Warmth motive within-person	−.06(.03)[−.12,.00]	.25
Distraction × Competence motive between-person	.14(.06)[.01,.27]	.22
Distraction × Competence motive within-person	−.04(.03)[−.10,.01]	.46
Distraction × Pro-hedonic motive between-person	.15(.05)[.04,.26]	<.01
Distraction × Pro-hedonic motive within-person	.09(.03)[.02,.16]	<.01
Random effects
Level 1 residual	.94	<.001
Level 2 residual	.04	.01

Note. b(SE) 95%CI = standardized fixed effect estimates with standard errors in parentheses, followed by 95% confidence intervals; p = p-value. ER strategies were dummy coded as 0 = not pursued and 1 = pursued. Suppression was used as the reference group. ER motives, strategy type, and their interactions were entered as simultaneous predictors.