Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 27;18(7):e0289076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289076

Table 1. Assessment of channel quality.

% signal dropped % artifact removed Power amplitude (V2/Hz)
channel 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
58–21
baseline 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 2.0 6.1 1.9 1.2 7.6e+07 8.3e+08 1.4e+08 1.2+e08
feeding 18.3 18.4 17.9 18.2 6.5 2.8 7.3 5.4 2.0e+08 3.1e+08 4.0e+08 2.3+e08
60–21
baseline 0.5 0.5 1.3 0.5 3.0 0.6 51.2 7.9 3.0e+08 7.2e+07 8.7e+08 6.7e+08
feeding 4.4 0.9 1.6 0.9 9.6 4.8 57.2 8.6 4.6e+08 1.4e+08 8.7e+08 4.1e+08
87–21
baseline 2.8 0.7 0.2 0.1 2.2 4.6 3.1 0.4 1.9e+08 9.1e+07 7.7e+07 2.0e+07
feeding 2.6 6.4 3.9 0.3 2.4 12.7 40.9 0.9 1.2e+08 4.7e+08 9.8e+08 9.5e+07
103–21
baseline 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0e+08 1.5e+08 6.4e+07 4.9e+07
eeding 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 5.7e+08 2.0e+08 1.4e+08 7.4e+07

Red indicates channels with low quality based on the criterion of > 20% removal; Power amplitude is in E (scientific) notation