Table 12.
Comparison of classification accuracy on CK+-O with existing models
| Reference | Accuracy (%) on non-occluded faces | Accuracy (%) on occluded faces |
|---|---|---|
| Liu et al. (2018) | 99.02 | 63.00 |
| Wen et al. (2017) | 76.05 | – |
| Li et al. (2019b) | 78.47 | – |
| Zia et al. (2018) | 92.00 | – |
| Sun et al. (2019) | 96.15 | – |
| Poux et al. (2021) | 91.3 | 88.8 |
| Li et al. (2018a) | 97.03 | 93.92 |
| Dong et al. (2019) | 93.00 | 90.30 |
| Dapogny et al. (2018) | 94.30 | 91.50 |
| Proposed CES-CNN | 96.64 | 95.76 |
Bold represents the better accuracy value of the proposed model