Table 2.
Risk of bias assessment with ROBINS-I (n = 5)
Aragaki et al. (2022) (for OS) | Bajorin et al. (2021) (for DFS) | Bellmunt et al. (2017) (for OS) | Bellmunt et al. (2021) (for DFS) | Hoffman-Censits et al. (2019) (for OS; abstract) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Risk of bias due to confounding | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |
Bias in selection of participants into the study | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Bias in classification of interventions | Low | Low | Low | Low | Moderate |
Bias due to deviations from intended interventions | Low | Low | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |
Bias due to missing data | Moderate | Low | Low | Low | Serious |
Bias in measurement of outcomes | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Serious |
Bias in selection of the reported results | Moderate | Low | Low | Low | Serious |
Overall risk of Bias | Moderate | Low | Low | Low | Serious |