Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 30;149(11):9461–9485. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04753-8

Table 2.

Outcomes by PTP support setting

a) Distress, resilience, and coping by PTP support setting
Outcome Study characteristics 1t1 FTF OSG
(−) (0) (0) (+ +) (+ +) (−) (0) (+ +) (+ +) (−) (0) (+ +)
Distress/coping Author ⇓Reading direction Gotay et al. (2007) Lee et al. (2013) White et al. (2014) Lee et al. (2013) ⇓Reading direction Schover et al. (2011) Mollaei et al. (2022) Weber et al. (2007b) ⇓Reading direction Høybye et al. (2010)
Endpoint and assessment tool Psychosocial distress [CARES-SF] Adjustment to Cancer [Mini-MAC] Distress [Impact of Event Scale, IES] Self-Efficacy for self-management [SE-Scale]] Emotional distress/Brief Symptom Inventory-18, [BSI-18] Resilience Score [CD-RISC] Self-Efficacy [SICPA] Psychological distress [POMS-SF] and [Mini-MAC]
Time of assessment Short term (primary, at 3 months) Short-term (6 weeks) Short term (4 months [t2, end of intervention), 6 months [t3, at 2 months]) Short-term (6 weeks) Short-term/long-term (6 weeks/6, and 12 months) Short-term (1 week) Short-term (8 weeks) Short-term/long-term (1/6, and 12 months)
Duration of intervention 4–8 telephone calls over 1 months 1 meeting/week for 6 weeks 4 months 1 meeting/week for 6 weeks

3 × meetings throughout a

6 weeks treatment period

1/week for 4 weeks 1/week for 8 weeks Up to 13 months
Effectiveness No effect of the intervention No effect of the intervention Greater decrease in the TG than CG at t2 and t3 Significant difference in change: greater increase in TG after intervention No effect (time × treatment group) Significantly higher resilience score in TG at 1 week Significantly higher self-efficacy in TG at 8 weeks No effect of the intervention
Effect size No data on effect sizes No data on effect sizes No data on effect sizes No data on effect sizes Cohen d 0.14 No data on effect sizes No data on effect sizes No data on effect sizes
b) Depression/anxiety by PTP support setting
Outcome Study characteristics 1t1 1t1 1t1 or FTF 1t1 FTF OSG
(−) (0) (0) (+ +) (−) (0) (+ +) (+ +) (−) (0) (+ +)
Depression/anxiety Author ⇓Reading direction Gotay et al. (2007) Lee et al. (2013) ⇓Reading direction Schover et al. (2011) Weber et al. (2007a) Salzer et al. (2010) Klemm (2012)
Endpoint and assessment tool Depression [CES-D] Anxiety and Depression [HADS] BSI-18—Depression subscale Geriatric Depression Scale [GDS] Hopkins Symptoms Checklist; Anxiety and Depression [HSCL-25] Depression [CES-D]
Time of assessment 3 months (primary) and 6 months 6 weeks after intervention Short-term/long-term (6 weeks/6 and 12 months) Short-term (8 weeks) Short-term/long-term (4/12 months) 6, 12, and 16 weeks (i.e., 4 weeks after end of intervention)
Duration of intervention 4–8 telephone calls over 1 months 1 meeting/week for 6 weeks

3 × meetings throughout a

6 weeks treatment period

1/week for 8 weeks N/A 12 weeks
Effectiveness No effect of the intervention No effect of the intervention Greater decrease in TG at 6 weeks and 6 months, but no difference at 12 months Significantly lower depression in TG at 8 weeks Contrary to hypothesis: CG performed better No effect of time, or time × intervention
Effect size No data on effect sizes No data on effect sizes Cohen d 0.14 No data on effect sizes Effect size es = 0.40 at 4 and 12 months No data on effect sizes
c) (Health-related) quality of Life by PTP support setting
Objective Study characteristics 1t1 1t1 or FTF FTF OSG
(−) (0) (+ +) (−) (0) (+ +) (+ +) (−) (0) (+ +)
(Health-related) QoL Author ⇓Reading direction Toija et al. (2019) Giese-Davis et al. (2016) ⇓Reading direction Schover et al. (2011) Sharif et al. (2010) Weber et al. (2007b) Salzer et al. (2010) ⇓Reading direction Osei et al. (2013)
Endpoint and assessment tool [15D, and EORTC QLQ-C30; EORTC QLQ-BR23] [FACT-B; Breast Cancer spec well-being, BSW] Spiritual well-being [FACIT-Sp] EORTC-QLQ-C30], [EORTC-QLQ-BR23] [MOS SF-36] and Prostate-specific QoL (UCLA) Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-BC [FACT-B] [SF-12; EPIC-26 (Extended Prostate Cancer Index)]
Time of assessment Short-term/long-term (3-/6-, and 12 months Long-term (12 months) Short-term/long-term (6 weeks/6 and 12 months Short-term (4 weeks, 2 months) Short-term (8 weeks) Short-term/long-term (4/12 months) Short-term (6, and 8 weeks)
Duration of intervention approximately 1 call/week one-to-five times Up to 6 months 3 × meetings throughout 6 weeks 1 meeting/week up to 4 weeks 1/week for 8 weeks N/A 6 weeks
Effectiveness No effect of the intervention Significantly improvement in TG vs. CG No effect of the intervention Significant improvement in TG; reduction in CG TG significantly accounted for physical role functioning, bowel function, mental health, and social function Contrary to hypothesis: CG had better scores than TG Significant interaction time × group at 6 weeks; return to BL level at 8 weeks
Effect sizes No data on effect sizes Cohen’s d = 0.41 No data on effect sizes No data on effect sizes No data on effect sizes

es at 4 months 0.48

es at 12 months 0.55

No data on effect sizes
d) Other outcomes by PTP support setting
Objective Study characteristics 1t1 FTF OSG
(−) (0) (0) (+ +) (+ +) (−) (0) (+ +) (−) (0) (+ +)
Others Author Chambers et al. (2019) Chambers et al. (2015) Giese-Davis et al. (2016) Pinto et al. (2015) Galvão et al. (2018) ⇓Reading direction Schover et al. (2011)
Endpoint and assessment tool Psycho-sexual morbidity Psycho-sexual morbidity Post-traumatic stress disorder Checklist-Civilian Version [PCL-C] MVPA (moderate-to-vigorous physical activity) Physical activity: Resistance exercise duration Sexual Functioning [FSFI]
Time of assessment Long-term (2, 3, 4, 5 year follow-up) Short-term/long-term (3/6, and 12 months) Long-term (12 months) Short-term/long-term (3/6 months) Short-term/long-term (3/6, and 12 months) Short-term/long-term (6 weeks/6, and 12 months
Duration of intervention 6–8 telephone-delivered support up to 22 weeks post recruitment 6–8 telephone-delivered support up to 22 weeks post recruitment 1x/week up to 6 months 12 weeks 1x/months; 6 months 3 × meetings throughout a 6 weeks treatment period
Effectiveness

Sexual supportive care needs: Higher in men of TG1 at 3 years

Masculine self-esteem: Less in TG1 than TG2 at 2 and 5 years

Treatment for erectile dysfunction: TG1 and TG2 were more likely to use medical treatment for erectile dysfunction at 2, 3, 4, 5 years

No significant effects on sexual function, sexuality needs, sexual self-confidence, masculine self-esteem, marital satisfaction or intimacy either for men or women. Men in TG were more likely to use medical treatment for erectile dysfunction No effect of the intervention Significant between-group differences: Greater increase of MVPA in TG at 12 and 24 weeks Significant interaction time × group: Greater resistance in TG at 3 and 6 months No effect of the intervention
Effect sizes No data on effect sizes No data on effect sizes No data on effect sizes No data on effect sizes No data on effect sizes No data on effect sizes

(+ +) = Statistically significant difference TG vs. CG at p < 0.05; (−) = Statistically significant difference CG vs. TG at p < 0.05; (0) = No significant difference between groups

OSG Online Support Group, 1t1 one-to-one, FTF face-to-face, TG Treatment Group, CG Control Group, FU follow-up after end of intervention, short-term FU (0 ≤ 6 months), long-term FU (≥ 6 months)