Table 3.

Reported accuracy of 2D and 3D templating in total knee arthroplasty

Authors	Year	N =	Method	Accuracy overall %	Exact match femur %	Exact match tibia %	Exact or accurate match femur %	Exact or accurate match tibia %
Kniesel et al. [12]	2014	46	2D templating with calibration marker	n.a.	n.a.	n.a.	98	100
Miller et al. [13]	2012	50	2D templating with 115% magnification	n.a.	65	60	100	100
Hernandez-Vaquero et al. [14]	2013	50	2D templating, constant distance knee to X-ray tube	n.a.	55	50	90	94
Wallace et al. [15]	2020	181	2D templating, inconsistent use of reference markers	n.a.	35.4	36.5	86.2	85.1
Seaver et al. [16]	2020	125	2D templating, manual planning	n.a.	56	61.6	97.6	95.2
León-Muñoz et al. [17]	2020	336	3D templating	n.a.	95.8	92.6	100	100
Pietrzak et al. [18]	2019	31	2D templating	n.a.	52.9	28.7	n.a.	n.a.
Pietrzak et al. [18]	2019	31	3D templating	n.a.	96.6	93.1	n.a.	n.a.
Kobayashi et al. [19]	2012	100	3D templating	98	n.a.	n.a.	n.a.	n.a.
Kobayashi et al. [19]	2012	100	2D templating	59	n.a.	n.a.	n.a.	n.a.

n.a. not available