TABLE 1.
Growth condition | μ (h−1)
|
Proline concn (nmol/mg of protein)
|
Betaine concn (nmol/mg of protein)
|
Amino acid concnb (nmol/mg of protein)
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
wt | OSM35 | wt | OSM35 | wt | OSM35 | wt | OSM35 | |
CDM | 0.61 | 0.59 | 10 | 12 | –c | – | 460 | 490 |
CDM + NaCl | 0.43 | 0.51 | 4 | 5 | – | – | 560 | 790 |
CDM + Pro | 0.75 | 0.76 | 15 | 25 | – | – | 370 | 470 |
CDM + Pro + NaCl | 0.62 | 0.59 | 201 | 17 | – | – | 750 | 680 |
CDM + NaCl + Bet | 0.61 | 0.51 | 5 | 6 | 530 | – | 520 | 730 |
CDM + Pro + NaCl + Bet | 0.70 | 0.54 | 16 | 15 | 560 | – | 510 | 660 |
The cells were cultivated in the indicated medium. The final concentrations of the various additives were as follows: proline, 5.9 mM; NaCl, 0.3 M; betaine, 1 mM. A volume of culture in exponential phase (A600 = 0.8 to 1) corresponding to 1 mg of protein was filtered, and cytoplasmic content was released by osmotic downshock. Growth rates were determined independently in microplate assays, and the values are the means of triplicate experiments. Amino acid analysis was performed on an amino acid analyzer. Glycine betaine was quantified by HPLC. wt, wild type; Pro, proline; Bet, betaine.
The data represent the sum of the 19 amino acids (with proline) detected by the analysis. Data are the means of duplicate experiments.
–, Value below the detection limit (<2).