Table 1.
BCS (n = 212) |
M (n = 27) |
MIBR (n = 86) |
p-value* | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age n (%)** | 212 (100%) | 27 (100%) | 86 (100%) | ||||
Mean (SD) | 54.90a (11.09) | 65.19b (12.01) | 47.05c (10.90) | < 0.001 V | |||
Body-mass-index (kg/m2) n (%)** | 199 (93.9%) | 23 (85.2%) | 79 (91.9%) | ≈0.118 K | |||
Median (25%-, 75%-quartile) | 24.24 (21.22, 27.14) | 25.47 (21.64, 27.78) | 22.86 (20.66, 25.91) | ||||
Menopause n (%)** | 199 | (93.9%) | 23 | (85.2%) | 79 | (91.9%) | ≈0.001 |
Postmenopausal | 118a | (59.3%) | 17a | (73.9%) | 30b | (38.0%) | |
Premenopausal | 81a | (40.7%) | 6a | (26.1%) | 49b | (62.0%) | |
Comorbidities n (%)** | 199 | (93.9%) | 23 | (85.2%) | 79 | (91.9%) | ≈0.551 |
No | 106 | (53.3%) | 10 | (43.5%) | 38 | (48.1%) | |
Yes | 93 | (46.7%) | 13 | (56.5%) | 41 | (51.9%) | |
Smoking n (%)** | 199 | (93.9%) | 23 | (85.2%) | 79 | (91.9%) | ≈0.237F |
Non-smoker | 151 | (75.9%) | 17 | (73.9%) | 59 | (74.7%) | |
Active smoker | 30 | (15.1%) | 2 | (8.7%) | 7 | (8.9%) | |
Former smoker | 18 | (9.0%) | 4 | (17.4%) | 13 | (16.5%) | |
Alcohol consumption n (%)** | 199 | (93.9%) | 23 | (85.2%) | 79 | (91.9%) | ≈0.916F |
None | 52 | (26.1%) | 6 | (26.1%) | 21 | (26.6%) | |
Occasional | 112 | (56.3%) | 14 | (60.9%) | 48 | (60.8%) | |
Weekly | 27 | (13.6%) | 2 | (8.7%) | 9 | (11.4%) | |
Daily | 8 | (4.0%) | 1 | (4.3%) | 1 | (1.3%) | |
Relationship n (%)** | 176 | (83.0%) | 21 | (77.8%) | 70 | (81.4%) | ≈0.731 |
None | 23 | (13.1%) | 2 | (9.5%) | 9 | (12.9%) | |
Married/ cohabiting union |
131 | (74.4%) | 16 | (76.2%) | 56 | (80.0%) | |
Divorced/seperated | 14 | (8.0%) | 1 | (4.8%) | 4 | (5.7%) | |
Widowed | 8 | (4.5%) | 2 | (9.5%) | 1 | (1.4%) | |
Education n (%)** | 196 | (92.5%) | 23 | (85.2%) | 79 | (91.9%) | ≈0.624F |
No degree | 3 | (1.5%) | 1 | (4.3%) | 0 | (0.0%) | |
Low | 10 | (5.1%) | 1 | (4.3%) | 3 | (3.8%) | |
Medium | 45 | (23.0%) | 6 | (26.1%) | 15 | (19.0%) | |
High | 138 | (70.4%) | 15 | (65.2%) | 61 | (77.2%) |
SD Standard deviation
*Chi2-test was performed to test for group differences. Exceptions are indicated. In case of a p value below 0.05, a z-test for column proportions was performed as post-hoc-test
VUnivariate ANOVA was performed to test for group differences. In case of a p value below 0.05, a Tukey-test was performed as post-hoc-test
FFisher’s exact test was performed to test for group differences
KKruskal–wallis-test was performed to test for group differences
a,b,cSame letters indicate that the post-hoc test for two study groups (i.e. their values) had a p value above 0.05
**Number of patients per group with available data. Available data < full group size indicates missing data