Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 10;10(7):1196. doi: 10.3390/children10071196

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics and correlations (Spearman’s Rho) at T2 between emotional subjective wellbeing and all variables included in the study.

Variables 1 2 3.1 3.2 3.3 4.1 4.2 4.3 5
1. Age 1 −0.03 0.07 0.09 0.07 0.02 0.18 0.15 −0.23 *
2. Self-efficacy DM Manag. 1 0.34 *** 0.24 * 0.38 *** 0.58 *** 0.45 *** 0.41 *** 0.47 ***
Outcomes expectations DM
3.1. OEDM-P_Social 1 0.59 *** 0.42 *** 0.37 *** 0.33 *** 0.29 ** 0.23 *
3.2. OEDM-P_Energy 1 0.57 *** 0.40 *** 0.15 0.25 * 0.27 **
3.3. OEDM-P_Health 1 0.39 *** 0.32 *** 0.49 *** 0.44 ***
Perceived social support
4.1. MSPSS_Friends 1 0.47 *** 0.67 *** 0.48 ***
4.2. MSPSS_Family 1 0.55 *** 0.45 ***
4.3. MSPSS_Significant 1 0.37 ***
5. Emotional Subj.Wellbeing 1
M 14.93 3.90 3.36 4.08 4.38 4.30 4.30 4.39 2.09
SD 2.56 0.73 1.13 1.12 0.79 0.83 0.78 0.73 1.51
S −0.02 −0.54 −0.22 −1.30 −1.96 −1.63 −1.20 −1.46 −0.97
K −1.21 −0.30 −0.93 0.96 4.59 2.60 1.29 2.25 0.90
K-S 0.13 *** 0.12 *** 0.10 * 0.21 *** 0.22 *** 0.20 *** 0.19 *** 0.20 *** 0.11 ***

Note. Data of T2 (N = 97). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. SEDM-SF, Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Self-Management Short Form; OEDM-P, Positive Outcomes Expectations of Diabetes Self-Management; MSPSS, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support; ESW, emotional subjective wellbeing; M, mean; SD, standard deviation; S, skewness; K, kurtosis; K-S, Kolmogorov–Smirnov.