Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 30;10(7):281. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10070281

Table 1.

Advantages and disadvantages of aortic valve surgery approaches.

Full Sternotomy Hemi-Sternotomy Right Anterior Minithoracotomy
Access Unfettered view of whole mediastinum and whole heart Good access to aortic root, limited to whole heart Most challenging view
Sternal disruption Whole sternum To 2nd–4th intercostal spaces unilaterally or bilaterally None, although costal cartilages are sometimes divided (may include right mammary artery ligation)
Cannulation Full central Variable—from full central to aortic arterial only Typically requires peripheral cannulation
Instruments Standard cardiac Variable—can be standard or long-handled Typically requires long-handled
Technical difficulty Baseline Learning curve easily traversed, including for trainee surgeons Accepted to be technically challenging
Adjuncts Required None Variable—possible with standard equipment. Facilitated by rapid deployment valves, suture placement devices, and knot-tying devices Facilitated by rapid deployment valves, suture placement devices, and knot-tying devices;
Light source advantageous;
Single lung ventilation.
Benefits (from most recent meta-analyses) * Reduced intensive care and hospital length of stay;
Reduced ventilation time
Reduced hospital length of stay;
Reduced ventilation time;
Lower stroke rate;
Lower pacemaker rate
Risks * Increased operative time;
Increased costs
Increased operative time;
Increased costs (including vs. ministernotomy); Lung herniation

* compared to median sternotomy unless stated otherwise.