Table 7.2. – Results of clinical studies with cardiac resynchronization therapy according to gender.
Study | N of patients | Inclusion criterion | Randomization | HR of events (95%; P value) |
---|---|---|---|---|
COMPANION2 |
|
|
ODT vs ODT + CRT-D | HR for death: men: 0.63 (0.4-0.9) women: 0.58 (0.25-1.13) |
CARE-HF3 |
|
|
ODT vs ODT + CRT | HR for death or cardiac hospitalization: men: 0.62 (0.49-0.79) women: 0.64 (0.42-0.97) |
MADIT CRT4 |
|
|
ICD vs CRT-D | HR for HF or death: men: 0.76 (0.59-0.97) women: 0.37 (0.22-0.61) |
RAFT5 |
|
|
ICD vs CRT-D | HR for death or HF hospitalization: men: 0.82 (0.7-0.95) women: 0.52 (0.35-0.85) |
REVERSE6 |
|
|
CRT-on vs CRT-off | HR composite clinical outcome: men: 0.69 (0.43-1.11) women: 0.75 (0.26-2.19) |
MIRACLE7 |
|
|
CRT-on vs CRT-off | NYHA. quality of life. exercise capacity; women, but not men, with CRT experienced longer times for first HF hospitalization or death (p = 0.157) |
CRT: cardiac resynchronization therapy; CRT-D: cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator; HF; heart failure; HR: hazard ratio; ICD: implantable cardioverter defibrillator; LVEDV: left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; NYHA: New York Heart Association;ODT: optimized drug therapy; vs: versus.