Table 6.
Outcomes: horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation with xenogenic bone block graft compared with autogenous bone block graft
| Study |
Number of patients |
Graft type |
Number of implants |
Baseline width (mm) |
Complications prior to implant placement (%) |
Gain width (mm) |
Additional augmentation (%) |
Possibility of implant placement (%) |
Complications after implant placement (%) |
Survival of implants 6 months after loading (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |||||||||
| Romito et al. [24] | 32 |
ABB-MR (n ≥ 32) |
32 |
Clinically: 2.95 (0.76) |
18.8 |
Clinically: 3.51 (1.23) |
10 | 100 | 21.9 | 91a |
|
| ||||||||||
| 32 |
CXBB (n ≥ 32) |
32 |
Clinically: 2.65 (0.69) |
18.8 |
Clinically: 3.69 (1.55) |
13.3 | 96.7 | 12.5 | 81a | |
|
| ||||||||||
| Lima et al. [25] | 8 |
ABB-MR (n = 8) |
8 |
Clinically: 3.4 (1.7) |
0 |
Clinically: 4 (1.6) |
0 | 100 | 0 | 100a |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Radiographically: 3.7 (1.6) |
Radiographically: 4.1 (1.8) |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
CXBB (n = 8) |
8 |
Clinically: 3.3 (1.6) |
0 |
Clinically: 5.6 (1.5) |
0 | 100 | 0 | 100a | ||
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Radiographically: 3.6 (1.4) |
Radiographically: 5.7 (1.6) |
|||||||||
ainformation provided by the author after personal contact.
ABB-MR = autogenous bone block graft from mandibular ramus; CXBB = equine-derived collagenated xenogenic block.