Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 30;14(2):e1. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2023.14201

Table 7.

Outcomes: horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation with xenogenic bone block graft

Study Number of
patients
Graft type Number of
implants
Baseline width
(mm)
Complications prior to implant placement
(%)
Gain width
(mm)
Additional augmentation
(%)
Possibility of implant placement
(%)
Complications after implant placement
(%)
Survival of implants
6 months after loading
(%)
Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Parvini et al. [26] 16 CXBB
(n = 16)
16 Clinically:
3.68 (0.81)
6.3 Clinically:
5.09 (1.07)
12.5 100 0 100

Schwarz et al. [27] 10 CXBB
(n = 10)
9 Clinically:
4.18 (0.92)
70 Clinically:
3 (2.2)
0 80 NS 100

Angermair et al. [28] 5 CXBB
(n = 10)
9 Clinically:
3.5 (0.7)
10 Clinically:
3.6 (1.2)
0 90 66.7 66

Di Stefano et al. [29] 5 CEEB
(n = 5)
15 Radiographically:
3.86 (0.13)
0 Radiographically:
3.28 (0.15)
0 100 0 100

Ortiz-Vigón et al. [30] 15 CXBB
(n = 28)
24 Radiographically:
2.78 (0.55)
40 Radiographically:
4.12 (1.32)
15.4 86.7 0a 71a

ainformation provided by the author after personal contact.

CXBB = equine-derived collagenated xenogenic block; CEEB = collagen-preserving, enzyme-deantigenic; equine-derived bone blocks; NS = not specified.