Skip to main content
. 1999 Jan;73(1):186–197. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.1.186-197.1999

TABLE 4.

Summary of serological, clinical, and ASC data

Group no.a VN on PID 0bc Postinoculationd
PID 21ef
Postchallenged
PCD 7e
% of pigs with diarrheag % of pigs shedding virush VNc IgA ASC
IgG ASC
% of pigs with diarrhea % of pigs shedding virus IgA ASC
IgG ASC
Di Ij D I D I D I
1 1,566 A 23 B 64 B 684 A 11* 7*  9* 14* 42 A, B 17 A 25* 20* 13* 51▵
2 1,792 A 33 B 50  B 543 A, B 0* 1*  0* 3* 60 A 20 A 1* 1* 3*  1*
3 17 B 100 A 100 A 305 B, C 48 39 29□ 77 25 A, B 0 A 57 35 15* 85
4 11 B 91 A 73  B 190 C 27 22 15 111 33 A, B 17 A 39 25 16* 35
5 <4 C 95 A 100 A 79 D 40 66 52 76 12 B 0 A 94 43 56 56
a

For an explanation of groups, see Table 1, footnote i

b

VN, VN GMT. 

c

Means in these columns followed by different letters differ significantly (one-way ANOVA; log-transformed titers). 

d

Proportions in these columns followed by different letters differ significantly (Fisher’s exact test). 

e

Symbols: *, group differed significantly from group 5 for the same isotype at the same time point (Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test); ▵, groups 1 and 2 differed significantly for the same isotype at the same time point (Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test); □, groups 3 and 4 differed significantly for the same isotype at the same time point (Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test). 

f

PID 21 = day of challenge. 

g

Feces were scored as follows: 0, normal; 1, pasty; 2, semiliquid; 3, liquid; feces with a score of ≥2 was considered diarrheic. 

h

Determined by ELISA and CCIF infectivity assay. 

i

D, duodenum. 

j

I, ileum.