Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 7;13(3):313–327. doi: 10.1007/s13534-023-00305-8

Table 4.

Performances of reported sleep staging using the signals from nearable devices

Type Signals / Models # of
Stages
# of
Rec.
Performance Ref.
ACC (%) Kappa
Radar

Sig_hba., Sig_ra., Mov.

/ LSTM

4 51 82.6 0.73 [45]

Sig_hba., Sig_ra., Mov.

/ K-Nearest Neighbor

4 13 81.0 - [46]
RF spectrogram / Conditional Adversarial Discriminator 4 100 79.8 0.70 [47]
Resp. Mov. / LSTM 4 71 76.0 0.63 [48]
- 4 40 70.0 0.53 [49]
Microphone Resp.-related sound Feedforward neural network 3 250 86.9 0.69 [50]

CNN + LSTM

+Transformer

4 1481 - 0.52 [51]
Film / bed installed BCG, Resp. Mov. / LSTM 4 60 73.9 0.55 [52]
BCG, Resp. Mov. / DNN 2 45 86.0 0.45 [53]
Resp. Mov / Rule-based model 4 25 70.9 0.48 [54]
BCG, Resp. Mov. / - 4 102 79.0 0.68 [55]
BCG, Resp. Mov. / - 4 85 64.5 0.46 [56]

# of Rec. number of data points, ACC. accuracy, Ref. reference, Sig_hba. signal, reflecting the heartbeat activity from the radar signal, Sig_ra. signal reflecting the respiratory activity from the radar signal, Mov. Movement, RF radio frequency, Resp. Respiration, BCG ballistocardiogram, LSTM Long-Short Term Memory, CNN convolutional neural network, DNN deep neural network