Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 23;16(7):100803. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100803

Table 4.

Immunological parameters between the good responsive and poor responsive groups at the end of the 2 years following cessation of SLIT.

Parameters Good responsive group Poor responsive group
IL-4 3.7 ± 1.5 3.1 ± 1.6
IL-5 38.6 ± 21.2 40.3 ± 18.3
IL-13 216 ± 98 178 ± 112
IL-17 108 ± 56 123 ± 64
IL-21 133 ± 87 127 ± 69
IL-10 46.8 ± 17.6 22.6 ± 15.4∗
TGF-beta 97.6 ± 43.8 53.1 ± 22.7∗
IL-35 316 ± 112 178 ± 103∗
Th2% 2.4 ± 0.9 2.6 ± 0.8
Th17% 0.8 ± 0.4 0.7 ± 0.6
Tfh2% 0.4 ± 0.2 0.3 ± 0.1
ILC2% 0.15 ± 0.04 0.13 ± 0.05
Treg% 2.3 ± 1.5 0.5 ± 0.2∗
Breg% 0.7 ± 0.2 0.1 ± 0.05∗
Tfr% 0.2 ± 0.1 0.08 ± 0.02∗

All the unit of cytokines were pg/ml; SLIT, sublingual immunotherapy, Treg, regulatory T cell, Breg, regulatory B cell, Tfr, follicular regulatory T cell, Th2, T helper 2 cell, Th17, T helper 17 cell, Tfh2, follicular T helper 2 cell, ILC2, group 2 innate lymphoid cells. The calculation of Th2, Th17, Tfh and Tfr cells percentage is based on the numbers of CD4+ T cell as the denominator. The calculation of Treg, Breg and ILC2 is based on the numbers PBMC as the denominator. ∗ Compared with Good responsive group, P < 0.05