Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 24;15(14):3280. doi: 10.3390/nu15143280

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis of different screening or assessment tools.

Tools Number of Studies (n) Poor Functional Outcome (OR with 95% CI) I2 Number of Studies (n) FIM Scores (WMD with 95% CI) I2 Number of Studies (n) Dysphagia (OR with 95% CI) I2
COUNT 6 2.04 (1.44 to 2.88) 72.1% 1 −4.52 (−16.64 to 7.60) 0% - - -
GNRI 5 1.67 (1.31 to 2.13) 52.4% 1 −41.73 (−50.48 to −32.97) 0% 1 3.58 (1.15 to 11.17) 0%
SGA 3 2.32 (1.69 to 3.19) 0% - - - - - -
NRS2002 3 2.69 (1.74 to 4.15) 40.8% - - - - - -
MUST 2 8.33 (6.88 to 10.08) 0.0% - - - - - -
PNI 2 3.00 (2.11 to 4.27) 13.0% - - - - - -
MNA 1 1.60 (0.88 to 2.91) 0% - - - - - -
MNA-SF 1 15.00 (3.57 to 63.04) 0% 1 −39.21 (−48.22 to −30.21) 0% - - -
ESPEN-DCM 1 3.05 (1.64 to 5.65) 0% 1 −29.43(−37.13 to −21.74) 0% 2 2.27 (0.82 to 6.25) 89.0%
GLIM criteria - - - 2 –17.38 (−27.79 to−6.97) 67.6% 1 2.88 (1.50 to 5.55) 0%
PG-SGA - - - - - - 1 5.26 (1.46 to 18.96) 0%