Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 26;59(7):1200. doi: 10.3390/medicina59071200

Table 2.

Risk of bias of cohort studies using CASP critical reading guidelines.

Study Question 1 Question 2 Question 3
Bean et al., 2020 [29] Yes Yes Yes
De Spiegeleer et al., 2020 [31] Yes Yes Yes
Elabd et al., 2021 [32] Yes Yes Yes
Fosbϕl et al., 2020 [33] Yes Yes Yes
Hippisley-Cox et al., 2020 [34] Yes Yes Yes
Jeffery et al., 2022 [35] Yes Yes Yes
Mancia et al., 2020 [37] Yes Yes Yes
Mazzoni et al., 2022 [38] Yes Yes Yes
Morales et al., 2021 [39] Yes Yes Yes
Palazzuoli et al., 2020 [40] Yes Yes Yes
Peñalvo et al., 2021 [41] Yes Yes Yes
Sha et al., 2020 [42] Yes Yes Yes
Trifiró et al., 2020 [44] Yes Yes Yes
Zhang et al., 2020 [45] Yes Yes Yes

Note: Question 1: Is the study focused on a clearly defined topic?; Question 2: Was the cohort recruited in the most appropriate way?; Question 3: Was the outcome measured precisely in order to minimize potential bias?