Table 2.
Quality assessment of the included studies using SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies.
| Study | Selection Bias | Performance Bias | Detection Bias |
Attrition Bias | Reporting Bias | Other | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Was the Allocation Sequence Adequately Generated and Applied? | Were the Groups Similar at Baseline or Were They Adjusted for Confounders in the Analysis? |
Was the Allocation Adequately Concealed? | Were the Animals Randomly Housed during the Experiment? | Were the Caregivers and/or Investigators Blinded from Knowledge of Which Intervention Each Animal Received during the Experiment? | Were Animals Selected at Random for Outcome Assessment? | Was the Outcome Assessor Blinded? |
Were Incomplete Outcome Data Adequately Addressed? | Are Reports of the Study Free of Selective Outcome Reporting? | Was the Study Apparently Free of Other Problems that could Result in High Risk of Bias? | |
| Makino et al. [31] | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | No | No | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Makino et al. [32] | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | No | No | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Makino et al. [33] | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | No | No | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Makino et al. [34] | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | No | No | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Sakurai et al. [35] | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | No | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes |