Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 29;23:279. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02571-9

Table 2.

Concordance between the consensus diagnosis with TBLC and the diagnosis with SLB

Diagnostic
Step
step1P
(n = 52)
step1R
(n = 52)
step1C
(n = 52)
step2
(n = 52)
step3
(n = 52)
step4
(n = 52)
step4(H/D)
(n = 38)
Agreement 42.3% 53.8% 67.3% 65.3% 55.8% 65.4% 76.3%
kappa 0.23 0.45 0.61 0.59 0.57 0.57 0.71
95%CI 0.08–0.39 0.29–0.61 0.45–0.76 0.44–0.74 0.43–0.72 0.42–0.73 0.55–0.87

Step4 (H/D): 38 cases were diagnosed with high or definite confidence in TBLC-MDD.step1P: consensus pathological diagnosis without clinical and radiological information. step1R: consensus radiological diagnosis without clinical and pathological information. Step1C: Consensus clinical diagnosis without radiological diagnosis and pathological information Step2: Consensus clinical diagnosis with radiological diagnosis and without pathological information Step3: Consensus clinical diagnosis with radiological diagnosis and bronchoalveolar lavage analysis without pathological information Step4: MDD diagnosis with full information, including pathological diagnosis