Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 29.
Published in final edited form as: Med Eng Phys. 2022 Jun 30;106:103843. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103843

Table 1.

Parameters of network models used in this study.

Model type Fiber diameter (D, nm) Porosity (ϕ) Isotropic tensor (Ω)
1D Parallel a) 1000 0.978 N/A c)
1D Perpendicular a) 1000 0.978
2D Parallel a) 1000 0.955
2D Perpendicular a) 1000 0.955
3D Cubic a) 500 0.984
1000 0.936
2000 0.792
Randomly oriented (F30) b)
Group 1 1000 0.991 Ωxx=0.34, Ωyy=0.33, Ωzz=0.33
2000 0.964
3000 0.922
Group 2 1000 0.992 Ωxx=0.34, Ωyy=0.3, Ωzz=0.36
2000 0.969
3000 0.933
Group 3 1000 0.991 Ωxx=0.34, Ωyy=0.34, Ωzz=0.32
2000 0.964
3000 0.922
Randomly oriented (F50) b)
Group 1 1000 0.986 Ωxx=0.34, Ωyy=0.3, Ωzz=0.36
2000 0.943
3000 0.878
Group 2 1000 0.987 Ωxx=0.34, Ωyy=0.3, Ωzz=0.36
2000 0.949
3000 0.892
Group 3 1000 0.986 Ωxx=0.34, Ωyy=0.3, Ωzz=0.36
2000 0.949
3000 0.893
a)

aging ECM-mimetic fibrous network;

b)

young ECM-mimetic fibrous network;

c)

N/A: not applicable.