Skip to main content
. 2023 May 15;45:30. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2023.45.30.36072

Table 3.

distribution of the sample according to place of occurrence, number of harassments, psychological effect, types of psychological effect, harasser, action taken for investigation and who took the action

Variable Frequency (%)
Place of occurrence; n=130 Corridor 13 (10.0%)
Room (doctor, nursing, examination) 61 (46.9%)
Pharmacy 3 (2.3%)
Lab 2 (1.5%)
Reception 9 (6.9%)
Stairs 5 (3.8%)
Theatre 5 (3.8%)
Corridor, stairs, elevator 9 (6.9%)
Room (doctor, nursing, examination), corridor 3 (2.3%)
Reception, room (doctor, nursing, examination ), corridor 20 (15.4%)
Number of harassments; n=130 Once 22 (16.9%)
Twice 31 (23.8%)
Three 18 (13.8%)
More than 3 59 (45.4%)
Psychological effect; n=130 No 61 (46.9%)
Yes 69 (53.1%)
Type of psychological effect; n=69 Anger 1 (1.4%)
Ashamed 4 (5.8%)
Depression 8 (11.6%)
Disappointment 8 (11.6%)
Fear and anxiety 15 (21.7%)
Loss of desire to work 32 (46.4%)
All the above 1 (1.4%)
who harassed you? n=130 Staff member/supervisor/colleague 45 (34.6%)
Patient/co-patient/general public 43 (33.1%)
Both 42 (32.3%)
action taken for investigation; n=130 No 123 (94.6%)
Yes 7 (5.4%)
Who take the action; n=7 Community group 1 (14.3%)
Management/employer 3 (42.9%)
My self 1 (14.3%)
Police 1 (14.3%)
Union 1 (14.3%)